Open Source: Not Much of a Difference for Java

A little more than two years ago, in November 2006, Sun announced the Open Sourcing of the Java development language.  At the time, Sun was pressured by the user community and by companies with large investments in Java tools and applications, like IBM and BEA.

Two years later, the main difference seems to be that tensions between Sun and the Java community have dropped to levels of cordiality.
Beyond that, not much has changed.  Sun had voiced worries that Open Sourcing Java may cause the language to be forked, possibly alluding to and early-on attemp by Microsoft attempt to hijack Java by creating the copy-cat J++/J# language.

At least there haven’t been really any negatives to the switch.  Some pluses that have come out of the switch to Open Source include:
- Easier to bundle, package and ship
- More transparency when debugging code
- Greater access and acceptability to more people

Rod Johnson, creator of the Java Spring Framework commented that “We think that Sun open sourcing Java is a good thing, but we also think with the language itself, Sun was already doing a fairly good job running it.”

The direction of the language has not changed much and Sun still wields ultimate control over how the language will change, although the number of Java Specification Requests (JSRs) are way up.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ECM: Interwoven Acquired by Autonomy

2006 saw a huge boom of acquisition and consolidation activity among Enterprise Content management companies.
Last week Thursday UK-based Autonomy announced a cash offer to acquire Interwoven for $775 million.  Interwoven had just closed out the fourth quarter with $10.7 million profit on $69.8 million revenue.

The deal between the two companies is expected to close in the second quarter of 2009.  The combined organization would have 20,000 customers, and potentially provide cross-selling opportunity for Autonomy.  Interwoven is particularly strong in the legal market with 1200 of the world’s top law firms and 21 of Forbes Global 30 companies as customers.  Autonomy commented that the combination of the two companies would create the “largest company dedicated to the legal information management industry.”

Companies trying to meet compliance and e-discovery requirements to search unstructured documents and emails are driving demand for
content management software.  Autonomy’s chief executive Mike Lynch commented that their core Search engine is “powerful but useless without an airplane to bolt it onto”.  The Interwoven customer accounts would give Autonomy “airplanes onto which it can bolt its jet engine”.

Interwoven was one of the few remaining large pure-play content management companies left standing after acquisition of majors like Documentum and Stellant.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Technology: The Government and Social Media

The federal government might be the last place you’d expect to find information and creative critical thinking around Social Media.  The government has to date been paralyzed by security concerns.  The result has been that they have avoided the use of social media and Web 2.0 technologies.

The federal CIO council has created guidelines around the use of Social Media for Federal Departments and Agencies. It may be stretching it to say that the document is ‘forward thinking’, but it shows that under the Obama administration there is a much greater tendency to embrace and adopt technology than previously.

The document breaks down and identifies four types of social media: Inward Sharing, Outward Sharing, Inbound Sharing, and Outbound Sharing:

Inward Sharing: “The sharing of internal organizational documents through internal collaboration sites such as SharePoint portals and internal wikis.”

Outward Sharing: “Also known as inter-institutional sharing, enables Federal Government information to be shared with external groups, such as state and local governments, law enforcement, large corporations, and individuals.”

Inbound Sharing: “Also known as crowdsourcing, is similar to conducting a large online collaborative poll.”

Outbound Sharing: “Federal engagement on public commercial social media Websites.”

To address security concerns, the document outlines a hierarchy of controls that need to be in place to allow safe and secure use of these technologies:

Policy Control:  Each federal agency should develop a social media communications strategy.

Acquisition Control: Social media needs to meet enhanced security requirements in order to be used in the goverment, especially in the area of authentication, user profiles, adoption of security best practices, and security code reviews.

Training Control: Users need to be bade aware of proper social media policy, guidelines and best practices. Network Controls: Networks where the software is hosted need to comply with the Federal Trusted Internet Connection program which describes best practices around inspection, monitoring, detection and blocking technologies.

Host Control:   The government is creating a hardened Common Operating Environment.  Software should be hosted and made available in such an environment.


Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)