Open Source: Vendors increasingly Turn to Open Source When Building Proprietary Software

The Zenoss survey we cited in yesterday’s blog found that 98 percent of companies have Open Source software running somewhere in their companies.  It turns out that even SAP is changing its mind about Open Source.   SAP has long been a symbol of traditional proprietary software company.   And in a previous world when things were more black and white, Open Source and proprietary software where distinctly different and opposite things.  That distinction is not so clear any more.   Claus von Riegen says at SAP that they’ve changed from asking, “Why open source?”  to start asking “Why not?”  Even Von Riegen’s title at SAP, “director of technology standards and open source”,  highlights a change both in SAP strategy and thinking.

Like most companies, SAP has now come to the conclusion that, when used carefully, Open Source can provide competitive advantage.  Part of their change in thinking may also have been the feeling that not using Open Source actually was putting them at a competitive disadvantage.  Vendors are finding that for many parts of the software that they build, they don’t always need to re-invent the wheel.  Vendors can save time and resources by selecting Open Source components that provide non-differentiating features of the software, allowing them to focusing on other areas of their software that will allow them to differentiate themselves.

While the change in thinking about Open Source at SAP hasn’t really come overnight, their use of Open Source was brought to people’s attention when SAP recently signed on to use the Black Duck suite tools.  The Black Duck tools help developers locate available Open Source software and then assist them in making sure that the code is used in a way that complies with the code’s  license.  SAP plans to deploy the Black Duck tools generally across all its developers by some time in 2011.

Francis Ip, head of global technology and legal compliance at SAP, said ”with the continuously increasing importance of open source globally … it was necessary for us to scale our open source process through further automation.  We conducted an exhaustive search … and the Black Duck Suite was the best solution we tested. The Black Duck Suite will help us further automate and scale our open source process.”

Prior to this announcement, SAP had already been active with the funding a number of prominent Open Source projects that include Alfresco, Red Hat, MySQL, JasperSoft, Zend, Groundwork and Intalio.  And Open Source software had been used in SAP development, but the approval process and guarantee of compliance with licenses was often often slow and time consuming.

SAP’s announcement to start using the Black Duck tools is a good indication that we can expect to see SAP building more of their proprietary software with open source components.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Open Source: Quality, Flexibility and Cost

Open Source has matured to the point where it is now used to some extent in every company.  98 percent of respondents to a survey said that their organizations make use of Open Source in some way.  The people answering the survey were IT professionals in areas like network operations, server management and engineering.  Many of the results echo that of another recent survey taken on Open Source software sponsored by Accenture.

Here are some of the other results from the survey:

  • Open Source software is getting easier to use.  In the most recent survey, 71 percent said that installing Open Source souftware is easier to install than proprietary software.  That number has been steadily increasing.  In 2006, just 26 percent thought that Open Source was easier to install.  It was 38 percent in 2007, and 48 percent in 2008.
  • The compelling reasons cited for using Open Source included Flexibility at 73.9 percent and Cost Savings at 71 percent.
  • On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, Open Source users indicated an average level of satisfaction between 7 and 8.
  • Nearly 40 percent of the respondents cited the economy as a main driver into leading them to consider and then adopt Open Source.
  • 50 percent of the respondents said that they were also using some form of cloud computing which included hosted applications, public cloud services like Amazon, or hosted storage.
  • Top IT management priorities in 2010 are monitoring, configuration management, patching, provisioning and security.

On the negative side, the biggest complaint that users have with Open Source is poor support and lack of good documentation.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Business Intelligence: Open Source Catching Up, but Still Lags Proprietary

Open Source software pervades almost every segment of technology.  In some areas Open Source even has even become the leader.  For example, Linux versus UNIX, or Alfresco versus traditional ECM vendors.  Open Source Business Intelligence software is one area where there is a significant amount of work being done, but for now, according to a new report by Forrester, Open Source BI still has some holes when compared to proprietary offerings.  But, the gap between the two is closing rapidly.

Compared to proprietary software, Open Source software has lower initial costs and often provides good functionality.   With the source code available, in-house developers working with Open Source  often can become more engaged and knowledgeable about how the software internals work because they are able to study and understand the software source code, compared to proprietary software which is typically needs to be treated like a black box since access to the source code is not available.

The Forrester report evaluated the current capabilities of Open Source Business Intelligence software.  The BI software subcategories that Forrester included in the report include data integration, data mining and reporting tools.  The software that Forrester considered included Actuate, Jaspersoft, SpagoBI and Pentaho.   Comparable BI products are also offered by traditional software vendors like Oracle and SAP.

Of the Open Source products reviewed, Actuate was found to offer the the best BIRT functionality primarily because of its good reporting capabilities.  The Actuate product offers very traditional BI features and focuses on the creation of reports and dashboards.  Actuate was followed closely in the Forrester rankings by SpagoBI which offered a broader, more complete set of BI features that include data extraction, transform, and load (ETL) as well as other advanced analytics functionality.  The full Forrester report is available for download from Actuate.

The report advised not to  ”…be misguided.  Open source does not always equal free software. In some cases it is, but you will get what you pay for.”  Often the most sought after features of BI come with a for-fee Enterprise release of the product.  Those for-fee features might include, for example, high security, scalability and connectors to data sources.    For example, while the for-fee Enterprise Actuate BIRT product was highly rated, the for-free Community version called Eclipse BIRT was found to be just a set of components that are not well integrated and not really that useful.   There is a similar gap between the Enterprise and Community versions of the JasperSoft reporting tools.  Although Forrester points out that for-free community BI components may be useful to organizations staffed with developers, they are often not that worthwhile as-is out-of-the-box.

Also lacking in Open Source BI offerings are good interfaces for data interoperability between products.  The report found that the framework for integrating Open Source BI components among themselves was generally non-existent.

The Forrester report concluded that Enterprise versions of Open source are “slowly but surely bridging the gap” with their proprietary cousins, but community versions of the software still have quite a ways to go.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)